<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global: Do negative campaigns help?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voiceswithoutvotes.org/2008/10/07/global-do-negative-campaigns-help/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voiceswithoutvotes.org/2008/10/07/global-do-negative-campaigns-help/</link>
	<description>Americans vote. The world speaks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:24:42 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony Botha</title>
		<link>http://voiceswithoutvotes.org/2008/10/07/global-do-negative-campaigns-help/comment-page-1/#comment-1106</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Botha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voiceswithoutvotes.org/2008/10/07/global-do-negative-campaigns-help/#comment-1106</guid>
		<description>I think &quot;negative&quot; in US politics has taken on the connotation of &quot;sleazy&quot;. I think you can point out the negative&#039;s in the policy of opposing candidates to demonstrate the pro&#039;s and con&#039;s of the other candidates platform. Whenever &quot;negative&quot; is used in a &quot;sleazy&quot; manner it demonstrates a lack of character or substance of the person using these tactics. If there is a genuine negative in the history of a candidate would this not have been a disqualication criteria long before this stage of the campaign. People react to a negative tone in a similar vane they tend to get in a negative mode. A candidates primary function is to place his supporters in a positive mode so that they respond. Their negative mode may be counteractive in the long run. I think that Obama&#039;s campaign has generally created a positive response and therefore in the long run they have had this positive mood to carry them to the end. 
from South Africa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8220;negative&#8221; in US politics has taken on the connotation of &#8220;sleazy&#8221;. I think you can point out the negative&#8217;s in the policy of opposing candidates to demonstrate the pro&#8217;s and con&#8217;s of the other candidates platform. Whenever &#8220;negative&#8221; is used in a &#8220;sleazy&#8221; manner it demonstrates a lack of character or substance of the person using these tactics. If there is a genuine negative in the history of a candidate would this not have been a disqualication criteria long before this stage of the campaign. People react to a negative tone in a similar vane they tend to get in a negative mode. A candidates primary function is to place his supporters in a positive mode so that they respond. Their negative mode may be counteractive in the long run. I think that Obama&#8217;s campaign has generally created a positive response and therefore in the long run they have had this positive mood to carry them to the end.<br />
from South Africa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
