Political Clashing in Portuguese Blogs

The Portuguese blogosphere is in the midst of a controversial discussion about the US elections. Reading the blogs, one feels that the bloggers are talking about a Portuguese campaign, given the level of intensity in the discussion.

On the right we have the supporters of John McCain, who are cautious and less enthusiastic than the support given to Obama on the left. One of the bloggers that has written more about John McCain and his campaign is Cachimbo de Magritte. Note the blogger's defense of McCain, made by Nuno Pombo:

“Quando McCain desafiou Obama para a realização conjunta de 10 Town Hall Meetings, em que todas as pessoas de uma determinada comunidade poderiam questionar os candidatos acerca do que bem entendessem, convite esse que Obama recusou, ninguém levantou a voz em defesa da promoção e prática da ideia de democracia. Tarde piam, muito tarde, mesmo.”

When McCain challenged Obama for a ten joint Town Hall Meetings, in which anyone could ask anything to both candidates, this invitation was turned down by Obama, no one raised their voices in defense of the promotion and practice of the idea of democracy. They complain late, very late, indeed.

Miguel Morgado, in the same blog, writes about the prejudice of supporters of Obama:

O verdadeiro problema, parece-me, reside na digestão futura de uma possível derrota de Obama. É mais provável que Obama ganhe do que perca. Mas se Obama perder, então a lição que decorre deste discurso é simples: Mccain é o Presidente do preconceito racial, do ódio no seu estado puro; a América dividida no apoio entre candidatos é irreconciliável consigo mesma. Resta o combate puro e duro, pois não há mais nada a dizer, nem muito mais “ideias” a trocar. Alguns apoiantes de Obama referem na NYRB que a sua vitória mostraria ao mundo, nomeadamente ao Médio Oriente, que a América não é racista, que a América não se deixa mobilizar por ideias de superioridade civilizacional-racial. Mas o que dirão ao “mundo” estes americanos se Obama perder? Em coerência terão de dizer que a luta contra a América corresponde ao bom combate, ao combate contra o ódio, que é inevitavelmente uma guerra de extermínio. Não me parece que seja coisa que se diga.

The real problem, it seems, lies in the future digestion of a possible Obama's defeat. Obama is more likely to win than lose. But if Obama loses, then the lesson that emerges from these talks is simple: Mccain is the President of racial prejudice, of hatred in its pure state; the divided America when it comes to supporting candidates is irreconcilable with itself. The pure and hard fight remains, because there is nothing else to say, no many more “ideas” to exchange. Some of Obama's supporters say in the New York Review of Books that his victory would show to the world, particularly to the Middle East, that America is not racist, that America does not fall for racial-civilization superiority ideas. But what will the “world” think about these Americans if Obama looses? They will have to keep consistent and say that the fight against America is the good fight, the fight against hatred, which is inevitably an extermination war. And I do not think this is something that should be said.
Jugular, composed by several left-wing bloggers, is an excellent example of activism in support of Obama.

João Galamba, in response to the previous post by Miguel Morgado, said in a incisive way:

“A raça é uma variável necessária para explicar aquilo que para Danner (e para outros) não tem explicação. Ou seja: como é possível que perante a situação calamitosa dos EUA e quando as propostas de McCain não permitem inverter o que se passou nos últimos 8 anos, a eleição ainda não está decidida? A questão racial está muito longe de ser gratuita – ela pode ser necessária para tornar inteligível a posição de uma parte significativa da população americana. Mais: a própria campanha de McCain não sai inocente de tudo isto, pois tem contribuído de forma significativa para legitimar essa ideia. Não podemos dissociar uma campanha baseada no medo e na desconfiança – que procura caracterizar Obama como sendo o Outro, o inimigo, o estranho – da questão do racismo.”

Race is a necessary variable to explain those things which have no explanation for Danner (and others). In other words: how is it possible that, as the US faces this disastrous situation and McCain's proposals cannot reverse what happened in the last 8 years, the election has not yet been decided? The race issue is far from being over – it may be necessary to make the position of a significant part of the U.S. population comprehensible. MORE: McCain's own campaign does not come out innocent of all this, because it has contributed significantly to legitimize this idea. We cannot dissociate this campaign, based on fear and mistrust – which seeks to characterize Obama as the Other, the enemy, the stranger – from the racism issue

Palmira Silva, in the same blog, has been one of the left-wing activists committed to disqualifying Sarah Palin to the Portuguese public. She has been writing in a diary format, all the rotten actions of the Republican vice presidential candidate. An example:

Ontem, num rally em Des Moines, Iowa, Sarah Palin confirmou o seu total autismo quando fez pairar sobre a audiência o espectro do comunismo que o voto em Obama implicaria. De acordo com a quasi histérica governadora, Obama na presidência criaria um país «em que as pessoas não seriam livres». Como muito acertadamente aponta um dos comentadores do vídeo do dislate imediatamente colocado no YouTube, «Nos países em que as pessoas não são livres elas são controladas pelo medo. E é exactamente isso que Palin está a fazer aqui».

Yesterday, at a rally at Des Moines, Iowa, Sarah Palin showed her profound autism when she made the audience to hang on the specter of communism if they voted for Obama. According to the hysterical governor, Obama in the presidency would create a country “where people would not be free”. As one of the commentators on the YouTube video points out, “In countries where people are free they are not controlled by fear. And that is exactly what Palin is doing here.

But some people don’t follow their ideological position, like Jorge A. in the Despertar da Mente. He assumes the position of being a conservative ideological, but he is an ardent supporter of Barack Obama since the primaries against Hillary Cliton. We can see a lot of examples of people from the right supporting Obama.

1 comment

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »

Guidelines

  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.